9 Comments
User's avatar
Shannon (Imaginif Media) 🏳️‍🌈's avatar

This really makes me want to organize some smaller events. Maybe 2026.

Expand full comment
Kyle Davis's avatar

I host a 10-person con every January or February in a lake house. The neighborhood is deserted that time of year. Always an awesome time.

Expand full comment
Mad Jay's avatar

Nice! I'm thinking about a thing like this! 👍🏿

Expand full comment
Gary Only's avatar

Great read, and 100% in on little tables and small gatherings. 3 players is excellent, 4 is very good - 5+ is just too much. And weirdly, 2 seems like more work than a one-on-one game.

Now I'm thinking about the friend-of-the-family lake house here in Oly I could rent in the off season... RainCon 1 in 2025? Maybe?

Expand full comment
Mad Jay's avatar

Is that an invite? Got dice, will travel!

Expand full comment
Matthew Weik's avatar

I really resonated with this! Particularly when pointing out the opportunity for a wider spectrum of play experiences. I've been working on a setting that allows me to initiate impromptu sessions with an episodic nature. This gives me hope that other players will want to join in and participate in the types of stories I want bring out of the table going forward!

Expand full comment
Mad Jay's avatar

Nice! I'm also working on improving my open-table process for the same reasons!

Expand full comment
Adam's avatar

My sweet spot is me+3, so 4 total, but I feel like 5 is too many, so I voted in the smaller category.

Expand full comment
Mad Jay's avatar

I feel this especially in online games; three players and a GM is my sweet spot, too!

Expand full comment